In meeting at the meeting Saturday, the candidate of France unsuitable has put his mistakes on the account of the executive and attempted to sweep the reproaches of complacency which are made to him vis-à-vis Vladimir Putin.
by
One in a pineapple field in the southern hemisphere, the other in Paris to inaugurate the Farm of Agriculture. All the differentiate, boasts Jean-Luc Mélenchon, Emmanuel Macron. Justifying his four-day visit to the meeting at the time when Russian aircraft and tanks ravage Ukrainian territory, the candidate of France Insouchaise (LFI) has ceased on Saturday, February 26, to mark his radical opposition with the head of the ‘State. By his pride “to be here” in contrast with “an agreed appointment”. Especially, by exposing, from a French territory “located between Africa and Asia”, the diplomacy not aligned and altermondialist that he would lead if he was elected President of the Republic in April.
In the lobby of Saint-Denis exhibitions – where the 1,000 seating seats were not numerous to welcome its supporters – Jean-Luc Mélenchon asked for his “first official candidate” in Main opponent of Emmanuel Macron. “I’m high enough in the polls and quite looked because everyone knows it, I am an electoral turtle,” he recalled, convinced to face him in the second round. “Mélenchon President”, have changing the activists, some by brandishing his pocket publishing program when others waved a fan against the heat of summer austral.
“I referred to higher authorities “
In this context of “turning in history”, according to Mr. Macron, and of great anxiety in the opinion, no question for the candidate “Insoumis” to spare the president of attacks in the name of a feeling of national concord. Jean-Luc Mélenchon refuses to consider the presidential campaign pause.
A Emmanuel Macron who predicted that “war will last”, the candidate of the People’s Union directively replies that “cease climb” and “get a ceasefire because the unfortunate Ukrainians live under the bombs “. He claims “the immediate opening” of a conference of the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE). The choice is now done, he assures with gravity, between “the diplomacy of democracy or the total war”.
The member of Bouches-des-Rhône, to whom he is criticized for not thinking that Russia would trigger an invasion, had to recognize “an error”. But by rejecting the fault on executive power. “I referred to what the highest authorities of my country said. I was wrong to believe them,” he pletes. Before calling the press: “I said,” There is no risk of invasion “, it’s true, but we have to name the rest of the sentence that is:” Even the President of Ukraine “.” “
You have 63.97% of this article to read. The rest is reserved for subscribers.