The position of the confrontation of Western countries against China speaks of the “liberal totalitarianism” of the West, aimed at undermining the growing role of Beijing in global processes and the global economy, considers the official representative of the Russian Foreign Ministry Maria Zakharov. She wrote about this in its Telegram Channel.
Zakharova stated that on Friday, June 25, in The New York Times, an interview with US Secretary of State Anthony Blinken, who declared the unity of Washington’s views and Paris on the fact that China should not be allowed to play a dominant role in the world.
“The phrase is not just arrogant, but also reflective the essence of Western maneuvers – wrote a diplomat. – Protectible by the West” Values ”for verification is a real liberal totalitarianism. They can exist calmly at least ten years without calling any of the peaceful states and the enemy and opponent? “
Zakharova stressed that when studying other materials of the Western media, a pronounced “anti-Chinese subtext” can be seen.
“Leitmotif One – Meeting [” Big Sevenki “] In Carbis Bee, he became the first step to create an anti-Chinese Alliance of Western Democracy,” she wrote. – In official speeches, according to the summit, it stressed its participants. “
So, Zakharova, German Chancellor Angela Merkel stated that Germany would link cooperation with China with a human rights situation in the country, and Boris Johnson Prime Minister Boris Johnson offered Australia to stand her shoulder to the shoulder in the face of Chinese aggression. The American president of Joe Biden, in turn, sharply opposed China’s participation in the development of rules of world trade and technologies in the 21st century, wrote Zakharov.
Earlier, the official representative of the Foreign Ministry revealed the meaning of the “lies” of Britain on the incident with the destroyer Defender, which crossed the sea border of Russia on June 23. In her opinion, the British “stubbornly blocked” that there was no warning volley so that they did not have to explain to their public, why to risk their people and equipment, and also “why, in principle, it was all necessary.”